From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Phil White <cerise-xfs@l.armory.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Problem with mkfs.xfs on a regular file
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2013 13:47:13 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131127024713.GE10988@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20131127023119.GB13101@boogeyman>
On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 06:31:19PM -0800, Phil White wrote:
> Gents:
>
> I was making an image for a VM using everyone's favorite fs with a line
> that looked something like this:
> -------------
> dd if=/dev/zero of=~/image bs=1024 count=1048576 && ./mkfs/mkfs.xfs && mount -o loop ~/image /mnt/loop
> -------------
>
>
> mkfs.xfs gave me this output:
> -------------
> meta-data=/root/image isize=256 agcount=4, agsize=65536 blks
> = sectsz=512 attr=2, projid32bit=0
> data = bsize=4096 blocks=262144, imaxpct=25
> = sunit=0 swidth=0 blks
> naming =version 2 bsize=4096 ascii-ci=0
> log =internal log bsize=4096 blocks=2560, version=2
> = sectsz=512 sunit=0 blks, lazy-count=1
> realtime =none extsz=4096 blocks=0, rtextents=0
> existing superblock read failed: Invalid argument
> mkfs.xfs: pwrite64 failed: Invalid argument
> mkfs.xfs: read failed: Invalid argument
> -------------
.....
>
> While it occurred to me that the problem might just be line 806 of some files
> in xfsprogs, I threw it under a debugger and took a closer look. The file
> descriptor value in xi->dfd pointed at ~/image. errno was set to 22. I
> thought that might indicate a problem with lseek(), so I rewrote the pwrite64()
> and pread() as lseek()s and read()/write()
>
> As you may have guessed, this did me no good at all.
>
> It's trying to read/write 512 bytes at the beginning of the file which seems
> reasonably innocuous. I double checked the man page which says that under
> 2.6, O_DIRECT writes can be aligned to 512 bytes without a problem.
That doesn't mean it is correct, because the man page also says:
" In Linux alignment restrictions vary by filesystem and kernel
version and might be absent entirely."
So, I bet that your underlying filesystem (i.e. the host filesystem)
has a sector size of 4k, and that's why direct Io on 512 byte
alignment is failing. In that case, run "mkfs.xfs -s size=4k ..."
and mkfs should just work fine...
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-11-27 2:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-11-27 2:31 Problem with mkfs.xfs on a regular file Phil White
2013-11-27 2:36 ` Phil White
2013-11-27 2:38 ` Nathan Scott
2013-11-27 2:41 ` Phil White
2013-11-27 2:47 ` Dave Chinner
2013-11-27 2:47 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2013-11-28 2:39 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-11-28 5:16 ` Dave Chinner
2013-11-28 5:34 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-11-28 10:01 ` Dave Chinner
2013-11-28 11:47 ` Phil White
2013-11-28 15:38 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-11-28 15:32 ` Eric Sandeen
2013-11-28 21:12 ` Dave Chinner
2013-11-29 1:28 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20131127024713.GE10988@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=cerise-xfs@l.armory.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox