From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BFA57F51 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:35:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E75AC003 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:35:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fHgDXfjEEQ9jGbEL (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:35:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:35:49 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/4] xfs: add O_TMPFILE support Message-ID: <20131128103549.GA26927@infradead.org> References: <1385379154-3802-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1385379154-3802-1-git-send-email-zwu.kernel@gmail.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Zhi Yong Wu Cc: Zhi Yong Wu , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 07:32:30PM +0800, Zhi Yong Wu wrote: > From: Zhi Yong Wu > > HI, folks > > The patchset is trying to add O_TMPFILE support to xfs. To make sure > that it is going ahead in the right direction, although it is only one > code draft, and hasn't strictly been tested, it is still post out ASAP. Btw, for the real submission we need proper xfstests coverage, I can't really believe how the other filesystems added it without QA coverage :( Besides the obvious test programs there's a reproducer for a a simple bug already in commit dda5690defe4af62ee120f055e98e40d97e4c760 in the kernel tree. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs