From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40F797F53 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 04:41:17 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A8AC8F8065 for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:41:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Uaq0P5CiVoU0g7Zn (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:41:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 28 Nov 2013 02:41:15 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] xfs: fix quota related problems Message-ID: <20131128104115.GD26927@infradead.org> References: <5294A449.9010202@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5294A449.9010202@oracle.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Jeff Liu Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 09:38:17PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote: > Since the infinite loop and assertion issue are failed due to different issues, I > wonder if we'd better to add two test cases to cover them separately or not? i.e, > One sanity check to verify turning group/project off quota with user quota is active, > another test to verify turning group/project quota off with fsstress is running. I always prefer to have isolated cases for bugs that are trivially reprodible instead of relying on heavy stress tests with multiple components. Vote for two test cases from me! _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs