From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3E757F3F for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 02:05:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC168F8039 for ; Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:05:40 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2013 00:05:38 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfsprogs v3.2.0-alpha2 Message-ID: <20131129080538.GA31310@infradead.org> References: <5293A699.20908@sgi.com> <20131128104002.GC26927@infradead.org> <20131128211858.GR10988@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131128211858.GR10988@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Rich Johnston , xfs-oss On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 08:18:58AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 02:40:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:35:53PM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote: > > > Alpha version 3.2.0-alpha2 of xfsprogs has been released. > > > > So what issues keep us issueing alpha release instead of making a proper > > .0 release? > > There's still things to fix in xfs_repair before we do a full > release. Run xfs/291 recently? Works fine for me on v4 super blocks, which is what I mostly care about for now as that's what is in the field. And we haven't sent fixed for our existing installed base out for over 6 month now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs