From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF887F3F for ; Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:38:26 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 4 Dec 2013 13:38:22 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_repair: suggest reboot after dangerous repair Message-ID: <20131204193822.GU1935@sgi.com> References: <52826206.3080106@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52826206.3080106@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: xfs-oss On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 11:14:46AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > If a "dangerous" repair (repair of a readonly mounted fs) > has been done, suggest an immediate reboot upon completion. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen > --- > > TBH, I don't know how "dangerous" dangerous is. Is this > still required? Was there a crash or something after a repair that led to this patch? Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs