From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DDF27F6A for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:46:13 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 13:46:13 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] xfs: use xfs_ilock_map_shared in xfs_qm_dqtobp Message-ID: <20131205194613.GI1935@sgi.com> References: <20131205155830.620826868@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131205155951.330689967@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131205155951.330689967@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:58:32AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We might not have read in the extent list at this point, so make sure we > take the ilock exclusively if we have to do so. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs