From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26E107F66 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:11:59 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 14:11:55 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: assert that we hold the ilock for extent map access Message-ID: <20131205201155.GL1935@sgi.com> References: <20131205155830.620826868@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131205155951.874279041@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131205155951.874279041@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Dec 05, 2013 at 07:58:35AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Make sure that xfs_bmapi_read has the ilock held in some way, and that > xfs_bmapi_write, xfs_bmapi_delay and xfs_iread_extents are called with > the ilock held exclusively. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Reviewed-by: Ben Myers _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs