From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2CF7F86 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 16:32:13 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B75168F8040 for ; Sun, 8 Dec 2013 14:32:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DXdn4JHqtLPXMWrd for ; Sun, 08 Dec 2013 14:31:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 09:31:52 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] xfs: remove xfs_iunlock_map_shared Message-ID: <20131208223152.GC31386@dastard> References: <20131206203006.914776999@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131206203128.352433582@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131206203128.352433582@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Dec 06, 2013 at 12:30:08PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > We can just use xfs_iunlock without any loss of clarity. > > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig Makes sense, gets rid of an unecessary wrapper. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs