From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7024A7F72 for ; Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:52:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 9 Dec 2013 12:52:56 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/11] xfs: add xfs_ilock_attr_map_shared Message-ID: <20131209185256.GV1935@sgi.com> References: <20131206203006.914776999@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131206203128.663030833@bombadil.infradead.org> <20131208223610.GE31386@dastard> <20131209181612.GA22183@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131209181612.GA22183@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 10:16:12AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Dec 09, 2013 at 09:36:10AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > > > + /* > > > + * Even after flushing the inode, there can still be > > > + * delalloc blocks on the inode beyond EOF due to > > > + * speculative reallocation. These are not removed > > > > "speculative preallocation" > > I just re-indented the comment, the wording is the original one. Maybe > we'll get a commit that cares enought to fix it on the fly.. Sure... _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs