public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Junho Ryu <jayr@google.com>
Cc: hughd@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, branto@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] xfstests: use mount point instead of device name
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:42:56 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20131211074256.GB19248@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1386706321-15795-3-git-send-email-jayr@google.com>

On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:11:53PM -0800, Junho Ryu wrote:
> From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> 
> A tmpfs mount does not involve any block device, its $SCRATCH_DEV is
> nothing but a place-holder, so apply 'df' or 'stat' to its mount point
> $SCRATCH_MNT instead of to $SCRATCH_DEV.
> 
> It also fixes a bug in generic/256: "stat -f $SCRATCH_DEV" returning the
> block size of the root file system, but not the test file system.
> 
> $ df | grep sda
> /dev/sda1    233191    62959    157791    29%    /boot
> 
> $ sudo dumpe2fs -h /dev/sda1 | grep "Block size"
> Block size:               1024
> 
> $ stat -f /dev/sda1 | grep "Block size"
> Block size: 4096       Fundamental block size: 4096
> 
> $ stat -f /boot | grep "Block size"
> Block size: 1024       Fundamental block size: 1024
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
> Signed-off-by: Junho Ryu <jayr@google.com>

Looks good,

Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>


Although I have to wonder how you got these tests to run, as it seems
like you didn't implement _scratch_mkfs_sized for tmpfs.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2013-12-11  7:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-12-10 20:11 [PATCH 00/10] Add tmpfs filesystem support Junho Ryu
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 01/10] xfstests: Add tmpfs support Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:40   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-17 16:40   ` Rich Johnston
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 02/10] xfstests: use mount point instead of device name Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:42   ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 03/10] xfstests: _scratch_mkfs_sized() for tmpfs Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 04/10] xfstests: increase tmpfs memory size Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:44   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 05/10] xfstests: do not unmount tmpfs during remount Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-11 22:40     ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12  0:16       ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-12  0:53         ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12 18:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 22:56         ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-13  0:00           ` Junho Ryu
2013-12-13  1:41             ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-13 11:12               ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-13  4:56           ` Theodore Ts'o
2013-12-13 11:04           ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 06/10] xfstests: fix generic/225 to check fiemap support Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:46   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-11 22:42     ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-12 18:01       ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-12 22:44         ` Junho Ryu
2013-12-12 23:00           ` Dave Chinner
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 07/10] xfstests: fix generic/127 to call _cleanup() only once Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:11 ` [PATCH 08/10] xfstests: check O_DIRECT support before testing direct I/O Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:47   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:12 ` [PATCH 09/10] xfstests: add executable permission to tests Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:48   ` Christoph Hellwig
2013-12-10 20:12 ` [PATCH 10/10] xfstests: skip parts of tests which cannot work on tmpfs Junho Ryu
2013-12-11  7:51   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20131211074256.GB19248@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=branto@redhat.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=jayr@google.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox