From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C59B7FF7 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 01:47:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7709AC00B for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:47:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id AViQDJEKglHssYYM (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:47:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2013 23:47:52 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/10] xfstests: check O_DIRECT support before testing direct I/O Message-ID: <20131211074752.GH19248@infradead.org> References: <1386706321-15795-1-git-send-email-jayr@google.com> <1386706321-15795-9-git-send-email-jayr@google.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1386706321-15795-9-git-send-email-jayr@google.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Junho Ryu Cc: hughd@google.com, tytso@mit.edu, branto@redhat.com, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:11:59PM -0800, Junho Ryu wrote: > Some filesystems do not support O_DIRECT. Check whether TEST_DIR supports it > by running xfs_io with and without -d flag. should be _require_odirect as we don't really care about xfs_io features but kernel/filesystem features. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs