From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EF429DF8 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:33:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2013 13:33:14 -0600 From: Ben Myers Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases Message-ID: <20131219193314.GX1935@sgi.com> References: <52B06E51.1020504@sgi.com> <52B32CE0.5070701@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52B32CE0.5070701@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Rich Johnston Cc: xfs-oss Hey Rich, On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:29:04AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote: > On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote: > >I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go > >on vacation. Any objections? > Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed? > > I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs. > > > > >Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any > >more comments on this subject? > Here is one of the threads discussing this. > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html > Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches? > > Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs? I suggest a branch directly off of 3.1.11 release, and then we can troll the log between refs/tags/3.1.11 and master for bugfixes. e.g. git checkout -b for-3.1.12 refs/tags/3.1.11 And then push it up to oss. Just my 2c. Regards, Ben _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs