From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DE129DF8 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 16:04:55 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679D98F809E for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:04:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fQ89AFWYox5QWB4Z for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2013 14:04:50 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:04:46 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [RFC] Userspace and xfstests releases Message-ID: <20131219220446.GA31386@dastard> References: <52B06E51.1020504@sgi.com> <52B32CE0.5070701@sgi.com> <20131219193314.GX1935@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131219193314.GX1935@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Ben Myers Cc: Rich Johnston , xfs-oss On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 01:33:14PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote: > Hey Rich, > > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:29:04AM -0600, Rich Johnston wrote: > > On 12/17/2013 09:31 AM, Rich Johnston wrote: > > >I was planning on a xfsdump and xfstests release this week before I go > > >on vacation. Any objections? > > Currently xfstests is not released, should this be changed? > > > > I will wait until I return on Jan 2 to release xfsprogs. > > > > > > > >Release versions for xfsprogs are still being discussed. Are there any > > >more comments on this subject? > > Here is one of the threads discussing this. > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-10/msg00421.html > > Christoph were you saying you create xfsprogs branches? > > > > Is there a consensus on version names/branches for xfsprogs? > > I suggest a branch directly off of 3.1.11 release, and then we can troll the > log between refs/tags/3.1.11 and master for bugfixes. > > e.g. git checkout -b for-3.1.12 refs/tags/3.1.11 > > And then push it up to oss. Agreed - we're not really ready for a 3.2.0 release yet. I also think that we'll need a couple of weeks to test any 3.1.12 branch that is made before it can be released, too. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs