From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7807F4E for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 17:08:18 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91467AC003 for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:08:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id DuWwuefFrzt7S3J8 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:08:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2014 15:08:14 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: xfsprogs 3.1.12 and 3.2.0 releases? Message-ID: <20140120230814.GA4287@infradead.org> References: <201401201822.48520.arekm@maven.pl> <20140120223000.GL18112@dastard> <201401202342.54755.arekm@maven.pl> <20140120230259.GM18112@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140120230259.GM18112@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 10:02:59AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Well, that's always been the plan since a 3.1.12 release was > proposed 3 months ago. How well has that plan been working out so > far? The sad part is that I would have had the time 3 month ago, but right now it's hard. Still trying to get it done, though. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs