* [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773
@ 2014-01-24 2:58 Dave Chinner
2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-01-24 2:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: xfs; +Cc: linux-ext4, linux-btrfs
Hi all,
The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has
just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your
outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in
this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be
picked up in the next update.
The new head of the master branch is commit:
197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
New Commits:
Dave Chinner (7):
[ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features
[b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems
[86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test
[5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test
[b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs
[3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size
[7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS
David Sterba (3):
[80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0
[586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally
[1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests
Eric Sandeen (1):
[a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files
Filipe David Borba Manana (1):
[8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue
Koen De Wit (2):
[0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy
[197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029
Code Diffstat:
README | 3 ++
check | 13 ++---
common/attr | 6 +++
common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +-
tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++---
tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++---
tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++---
tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +--
tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +-
tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +-
tests/btrfs/026 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/027 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/028 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/029 | 1 +
tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 +
tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++
tests/btrfs/group | 2 +
tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++
tests/ext4/group | 1 +
tests/generic/204 | 4 ++
tests/generic/208 | 2 +
tests/shared/298 | 2 +-
tests/xfs/073 | 2 +
tests/xfs/104 | 2 +-
tests/xfs/186 | 1 +
tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++-----
tests/xfs/244 | 1 +
tests/xfs/253 | 3 +-
tests/xfs/278 | 1 +
tests/xfs/287 | 3 +-
tests/xfs/291 | 4 +-
tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
tests/xfs/306.out | 2 +
tests/xfs/group | 1 +
45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-)
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 2014-01-24 2:58 [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 Dave Chinner @ 2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas 2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alex Lyakas @ 2014-01-29 19:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs Hi Dave, are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle supposed to pass on XFS? I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13 (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get: root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013 FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR generic/013 34s _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full) Ran: generic/013 Passed all 1 tests root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# echo $? 1 Thanks, Alex. On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has > just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your > outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in > this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be > picked up in the next update. > > The new head of the master branch is commit: > > 197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029 > > New Commits: > > Dave Chinner (7): > [ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features > [b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems > [86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test > [5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test > [b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs > [3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size > [7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS > > David Sterba (3): > [80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0 > [586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally > [1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests > > Eric Sandeen (1): > [a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files > > Filipe David Borba Manana (1): > [8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue > > Koen De Wit (2): > [0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy > [197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029 > > > Code Diffstat: > > README | 3 ++ > check | 13 ++--- > common/attr | 6 +++ > common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- > tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +- > tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++--- > tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +-- > tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +-- > tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++--- > tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++--- > tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +-- > tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +- > tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +- > tests/btrfs/026 | 1 + > tests/btrfs/027 | 1 + > tests/btrfs/028 | 1 + > tests/btrfs/029 | 1 + > tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 + > tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++ > tests/btrfs/group | 2 + > tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++ > tests/ext4/group | 1 + > tests/generic/204 | 4 ++ > tests/generic/208 | 2 + > tests/shared/298 | 2 +- > tests/xfs/073 | 2 + > tests/xfs/104 | 2 +- > tests/xfs/186 | 1 + > tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++----- > tests/xfs/244 | 1 + > tests/xfs/253 | 3 +- > tests/xfs/278 | 1 + > tests/xfs/287 | 3 +- > tests/xfs/291 | 4 +- > tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > tests/xfs/306.out | 2 + > tests/xfs/group | 1 + > 45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) > > -- > Dave Chinner > david@fromorbit.com > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas @ 2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen 2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Eric Sandeen @ 2014-01-29 20:04 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Lyakas, Dave Chinner; +Cc: xfs On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote: > Hi Dave, > are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle > supposed to pass on XFS? > I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13 > (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get: > > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013 > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR > > generic/013 34s > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see > /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full) uh, so it failed > Ran: generic/013 > Passed all 1 tests but it passed? ;) The fact that you saw: > generic/013 34s and not: > generic/013 34s ... 33s or > generic/013 34s ... output mismatch or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain. /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full has more info. Anyway, 013 generally passes AFAIK. -Eric > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# echo $? > 1 > > Thanks, > Alex. > > > On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 4:58 AM, Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> The xfstests repository at git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/cmds/xfstests has >> just been updated. Patches often get missed, so please check if your >> outstanding patches were in this update. If they have not been in >> this update, please resubmit them to xfs@oss.sgi.com so they can be >> picked up in the next update. >> >> The new head of the master branch is commit: >> >> 197f773 xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029 >> >> New Commits: >> >> Dave Chinner (7): >> [ea0b6eb] xfs: test scratch device mkfs features >> [b9b5d74] xfs: New _require_* tests for CRC enabled filesystems >> [86e91cc] xfs: add fsstress/recovery test >> [5b524ee] xfs/073, 208: remove .full output before starting the test >> [b04b0fd] xfs: support xfs_metadump with external logs >> [3ed573e] xfs/104: use fixed log size >> [7657a10] generic/204: use fixed log size for XFS >> >> David Sterba (3): >> [80622a6] xfstests: don't suggest to run full diff when DIFF_LENGTH is 0 >> [586a06c] xfstests: use value of FSTYP if defined externally >> [1ed9046] xfstests: clean command names in btrfs tests >> >> Eric Sandeen (1): >> [a93b1dd] ext4: regression test for ext4 resize with non-extent files >> >> Filipe David Borba Manana (1): >> [8c427eb] xfstests: add test for btrfs incremental send infinite loop issue >> >> Koen De Wit (2): >> [0c58766] xfstests: btrfs: cross-subvolume sparse copy >> [197f773] xfstests: define $seqres in btrfs/026-029 >> >> >> Code Diffstat: >> >> README | 3 ++ >> check | 13 ++--- >> common/attr | 6 +++ >> common/rc | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------- >> tests/btrfs/003 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/004 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/007 | 4 +- >> tests/btrfs/008 | 12 ++--- >> tests/btrfs/009 | 6 +-- >> tests/btrfs/013 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/014 | 6 +-- >> tests/btrfs/015 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/016 | 14 ++--- >> tests/btrfs/017 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/019 | 14 ++--- >> tests/btrfs/022 | 6 +-- >> tests/btrfs/024 | 2 +- >> tests/btrfs/025 | 4 +- >> tests/btrfs/026 | 1 + >> tests/btrfs/027 | 1 + >> tests/btrfs/028 | 1 + >> tests/btrfs/029 | 1 + >> tests/btrfs/030 | 149 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/btrfs/030.out | 1 + >> tests/btrfs/031 | 138 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/btrfs/031.out | 48 +++++++++++++++++ >> tests/btrfs/group | 2 + >> tests/ext4/306 | 82 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/ext4/306.out | 13 +++++ >> tests/ext4/group | 1 + >> tests/generic/204 | 4 ++ >> tests/generic/208 | 2 + >> tests/shared/298 | 2 +- >> tests/xfs/073 | 2 + >> tests/xfs/104 | 2 +- >> tests/xfs/186 | 1 + >> tests/xfs/187 | 32 ++++++----- >> tests/xfs/244 | 1 + >> tests/xfs/253 | 3 +- >> tests/xfs/278 | 1 + >> tests/xfs/287 | 3 +- >> tests/xfs/291 | 4 +- >> tests/xfs/306 | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tests/xfs/306.out | 2 + >> tests/xfs/group | 1 + >> 45 files changed, 716 insertions(+), 109 deletions(-) >> >> -- >> Dave Chinner >> david@fromorbit.com >> -- >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html > > _______________________________________________ > xfs mailing list > xfs@oss.sgi.com > http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs > _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen @ 2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner 2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-02-02 22:35 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: Alex Lyakas, xfs On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:04:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle > > supposed to pass on XFS? > > I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13 > > (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get: > > > > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check tests/generic/013 > > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR > > > > generic/013 34s > > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see > > /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full) > > uh, so it failed > > > Ran: generic/013 > > Passed all 1 tests > > but it passed? ;) It passed the test, but failed the post test filesystem checks. > The fact that you saw: > > > generic/013 34s > > and not: > > > generic/013 34s ... 33s > or > > generic/013 34s ... output mismatch > > or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was > corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain. No, what that means is that there was no results/check.time file that had previous runtime information in it. i.e. this is the first time the test was run, or that it has always failed like this in the past on this machine. As it is: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner @ 2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas 2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Alex Lyakas @ 2014-02-04 17:53 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Eric Sandeen; +Cc: xfs Hi Eric and Dave, Thank you for your comments. I don't know whether my information is of any value to you or anybody else, because I am using an EOL kernel 3.8.13. I have run xfstests several times on two different kinds of block devices. One is a local file attached to a KVM instance through virtio, second is a custom Device Mapper. My local.config file is: export TEST_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x5 export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x6 export TEST_DIR=/mnt/TEST_DIR export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/SCRATCH_DIR export FSTYP="xfs" A good amount of tests did not run, because, e.g., I do not have dump device etc. I list below the tests that failed for me consistently. I analyzed to a very limited extent these failures. At some point I decided to focus on making the tests that pass on a pristine XFS from my kernel, pass on XFS with my changes. xfstests/xfsprogs/xfsdumps were built from latest git. fio was build on a "golden" commit aeb32dfccbd05. tests/generic: generic/091 - dowrite: write: Invalid argument generic/204 - echo: write error: No space left on device generic/240 - silence is golden, but then: AIO write offset 512 expected 4096 got -22 ... generic/263 - ??? generic/299 - fio crash generic/300 - fio crash generic/314 - need XFS fix for that, which is not in kernel 3.8.13 tests/xfs: xfs/016 - log size 853 blocks too small, minimum size is 1605 blocks xfs/018 - ??? xfs/033 - Corrupting root inode - setting bits to 0, xfsrepair: xfs_imap_to_bp: xfs_trans_read_buf() returned error 117. xfs/041 - for some reason, in my case the log occupies much more blocks, and the 32-mb FS has no free space, so fill2fs fails xfs/073 - after copying, the target device has dirty log.. xfs/081 - logprint with quotas xfs/082 - v2 stripe logs with logprint xfs/096 - mkfs.xfs: Specified data stripe width 520 is not the same as the volume stripe width 1024 xfs/104 - log size 1280 blocks too small, minimum size is 1605 blocks xfs/109 - fails with ENOSPC xfs/111 - Overwrote IN @offset 16384 xfs/119 - log size 1200 blocks too small, minimum size is 1968 blocks xfs/122 - sizes/offsets of some structs/fields differ xfs/136 - difference in internal structure's content xfs/171 - failed, 4 streams with matching AGs xfs/172 - expected failure, matching AGs xfs/199 - different feature flags, like 0x8a instead of 0xa xfs/201 - pwrite64: Invalid argument xfs/206 - existing superblock read failed: Invalid argument xfs/216 - number of blocks for FS's up to 64g is 12800 (constant); fssize=1g existing superblock read failed: Invalid argument xfs/250 - xfs_repair: read failed: Invalid argument, _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /mnt/TEST_DIR/250.fs is inconsistent (r) (see /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//xfs/250.full) xfs/262 - hard limit 0 bytes, expected 524288000 xfs/279 - mkfs failures and ERROR: Module scsi_debug is in use xfs/291 - *** glibc detected *** xfs_repair: double free or corruption (!prev): 0x00007fbd3c0008c0 *** xfs/292 - output differs only in spaces xfs/296 - output is identical, except missing: missing: RESTORE_DIR/DUMP_SUBDIR/testfile cap_setgid,cap_setuid+ep xfs/297 - output is identical, at the end: _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vdb is inconsistent (c) (see /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//xfs/297.full) xfs/298 - single difference: core.nextents = 1 vs 0 xfs/306 doesn't fail, but sometimes triggers a memleak in xfs_trans Thanks, Alex. -----Original Message----- From: Dave Chinner Sent: 03 February, 2014 12:35 AM To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Alex Lyakas ; xfs@oss.sgi.com Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 02:04:08PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 1/29/14, 1:55 PM, Alex Lyakas wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > are all tests in xfstests (those relevant for XFS) in principle > > supposed to pass on XFS? > > I am running these tests on a pristine XFS from kernel 3.8.13 > > (srcversion 9862FA08CF42E06A4151111) and I get: > > > > root@vc-13-12-1095-35-dev:/mnt/work/alex/xfstests# ./check > > tests/generic/013 > > FSTYP -- xfs (non-debug) > > PLATFORM -- Linux/x86_64 vc-13-12-1095-35-dev 3.8.13-030813-generic > > MKFS_OPTIONS -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/vdb > > MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/vdb /mnt/SCRATCH_DIR > > > > generic/013 34s > > _check_xfs_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vda is inconsistent (c) (see > > /mnt/work/alex/xfstests/results//generic/013.full) > > uh, so it failed > > > Ran: generic/013 > > Passed all 1 tests > > but it passed? ;) It passed the test, but failed the post test filesystem checks. > The fact that you saw: > > > generic/013 34s > > and not: > > > generic/013 34s ... 33s > or > > generic/013 34s ... output mismatch > > or similar, makes me think the test did not even start, and /dev/vda was > corrupted before you even started the test, but I'm not certain. No, what that means is that there was no results/check.time file that had previous runtime information in it. i.e. this is the first time the test was run, or that it has always failed like this in the past on this machine. As it is: http://xfs.org/index.php/XFS_FAQ#Q:_What_information_should_I_include_when_reporting_a_problem.3F Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas @ 2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Dave Chinner @ 2014-02-04 22:23 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Alex Lyakas; +Cc: Eric Sandeen, xfs On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:53:04PM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote: > Hi Eric and Dave, > Thank you for your comments. > > I don't know whether my information is of any value to you or > anybody else, because I am using an EOL kernel 3.8.13. > I have run xfstests several times on two different kinds of block > devices. One is a local file attached to a KVM instance through > virtio, second is a custom Device Mapper. My local.config file is: > export TEST_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x5 > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x6 > export TEST_DIR=/mnt/TEST_DIR > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/SCRATCH_DIR > export FSTYP="xfs" I'm not going to go into every test failure, but it definitely sounds like you are running on a RAID device that exposes sunit/swidth to mkfs. That is the likely cause of all the log size and stripe unit related failure. Also, you are running deprecated tests and some that are known to fail. You should run the "auto" group tests as those are the known "good" tests that should be regularly run. i.e. Try running: # MKFS_OPTIONS="-d noalign" ./check -g auto and that should solve amny of the log size and enospc failures that you are seeing. What is left is likely to be things we really need to fix. FYI, we know there are things that need to be fixed - I currently see 13 tests from the auto group fail on CRC enabled filesystems: Failures: generic/263 generic/313 xfs/021 xfs/033 xfs/066 xfs/073 xfs/189 xfs/216 xfs/295 xfs/296 xfs/299 xfs/301 xfs/302 Failed 13 of 240 tests Several of these are test issues, some of them are bugs that need triage and fixing. We're slowly working our way through them fixing the test issues - we've been fixing 3-4 a week for the past few weeks, so the situation is getting much better - 3 weeks ago the same test machine was seeing ~25 failures in a run. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2014-02-04 22:23 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2014-01-24 2:58 [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 Dave Chinner 2014-01-29 19:55 ` Alex Lyakas 2014-01-29 20:04 ` Eric Sandeen 2014-02-02 22:35 ` Dave Chinner 2014-02-04 17:53 ` Alex Lyakas 2014-02-04 22:23 ` Dave Chinner
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).