From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 052317F51 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:23:05 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E279330408F for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:23:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id VNpLY2grbCm2IT9Q for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:23:03 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:23:00 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests updated to 197f773 Message-ID: <20140204222300.GD13997@dastard> References: <20140124025846.GL27606@dastard> <52E95EB8.8080003@sandeen.net> <20140202223525.GW2212@dastard> <4D99B558BC4F49568900AE5DEA05DE86@alyakaslap> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D99B558BC4F49568900AE5DEA05DE86@alyakaslap> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Alex Lyakas Cc: Eric Sandeen , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 07:53:04PM +0200, Alex Lyakas wrote: > Hi Eric and Dave, > Thank you for your comments. > > I don't know whether my information is of any value to you or > anybody else, because I am using an EOL kernel 3.8.13. > I have run xfstests several times on two different kinds of block > devices. One is a local file attached to a KVM instance through > virtio, second is a custom Device Mapper. My local.config file is: > export TEST_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x5 > export SCRATCH_DEV=/dev/mapper/vol-0x6 > export TEST_DIR=/mnt/TEST_DIR > export SCRATCH_MNT=/mnt/SCRATCH_DIR > export FSTYP="xfs" I'm not going to go into every test failure, but it definitely sounds like you are running on a RAID device that exposes sunit/swidth to mkfs. That is the likely cause of all the log size and stripe unit related failure. Also, you are running deprecated tests and some that are known to fail. You should run the "auto" group tests as those are the known "good" tests that should be regularly run. i.e. Try running: # MKFS_OPTIONS="-d noalign" ./check -g auto and that should solve amny of the log size and enospc failures that you are seeing. What is left is likely to be things we really need to fix. FYI, we know there are things that need to be fixed - I currently see 13 tests from the auto group fail on CRC enabled filesystems: Failures: generic/263 generic/313 xfs/021 xfs/033 xfs/066 xfs/073 xfs/189 xfs/216 xfs/295 xfs/296 xfs/299 xfs/301 xfs/302 Failed 13 of 240 tests Several of these are test issues, some of them are bugs that need triage and fixing. We're slowly working our way through them fixing the test issues - we've been fixing 3-4 a week for the past few weeks, so the situation is getting much better - 3 weeks ago the same test machine was seeing ~25 failures in a run. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs