From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 596A27F51 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 16:29:09 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483398F8037 for ; Tue, 4 Feb 2014 14:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id J9Xq5Z5N9OC8YBfx for ; Tue, 04 Feb 2014 14:29:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 09:29:01 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] support appending AIO writes Message-ID: <20140204222901.GE13997@dastard> References: <20140204172402.380571745@bombadil.infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140204172402.380571745@bombadil.infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Meirovich , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Feb 04, 2014 at 09:24:02AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > At least XFS can support appending AIO writes easily, and Sergey has > demonstrated a use case for them. > > I've not done any performance testing myself, but ensured that xfstests > already exercises the code path. The patches look sane. Does the dio change conflict with the work Al is doing right now of the direct IO path, or will marshalling that part of the change through the XFS tree be fine? Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs