public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mkfs: default log size for small filesystems too large
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2014 09:55:48 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140205225548.GG13997@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52F29116.4000201@redhat.com>

On Wed, Feb 05, 2014 at 02:29:26PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> On 02/05/2014 12:47 AM, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > 
> > Recent changes to the log size scaling have resulted in using the
> > default size multiplier for the log size even on small filesystems.
> > Commit 88cd79b ("xfs: Add xfs_log_rlimit.c") changed the calculation
> > of the maximum transaction size that the kernel would issues and
> > that significantly increased the minimum size of the default log.
> > As such the size of the log on small filesystems was typically
> > larger than the prefious default, even though the previous default
> 		previous
> > was still larger than the minimum needed.
> > 
> 
> Hey Dave,
> 
> Can you elaborate on what you mean by the previous default being larger
> than the minimum needed? If that is the case, doesn't that mean the
> calculations based on the max transaction size are not valid? Perhaps
> I'm not parsing something here.

The previous change for calculating the minimum log size also
changed the default log size at the same time. i.e. it changed it to
min_logblocks * XFS_DFL_LOG_FACTOR if that fit inside an AG.

Here's an example with small AGs (25MB). Current mkfs:

# mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=4265, version=2

That's a 17MB log in a 100MB filesystem. Way too large, and here's
what prompted this patch:

# mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m,sunit=512,swidth=2048 /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=1728, version=2

i.e add stripe unit alignment, and the log gets 3x smaller. Say
what?

The new mkfs gives:

# ~/packages/mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2
# ~/packages/mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m,sunit=512,swidth=2048 /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=2560, version=2

a 10MB log, which is consistent but arguably still too large for a
100MB filesystem.

So, what did we used to do in the 3.1.x series?

# apt-get install xfsprogs/stable
<installs 3.1.7>
# mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=1200, version=2
# mkfs.xfs -f -d size=100m,sunit=512,swidth=2048 /dev/vdc |grep log
log      =internal log           bsize=4096   blocks=1216, version=2

Ok, so historically it's been min_logblock sized....

> > Rework the default log size calculation such that it will use the
> > original log size default if it is larger than the minimum log size
> > required, and only use a larger log if the configuration of the
> > filesystem requires it.
> > 
> > This is especially obvious in xfs/216, where the default log size is
> > 10MB all the way up to 16GB filesystems. The current mkfs selects a
> > log size of 50MB for the same size filesystems and this is
> > unnecessarily large.
> > 
> > Return the scaling of the log size for small filesystems to
> > something similar to what xfs/216 expects.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c | 19 ++++++++++---------
> >  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> > index d82128c..4a29eea 100644
> > --- a/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> > +++ b/mkfs/xfs_mkfs.c
> > @@ -2377,17 +2377,18 @@ _("size %s specified for log subvolume is too large, maximum is %lld blocks\n"),
> >  		logblocks = MAX(min_logblocks, logblocks);
> >  
> >  		/*
> > -		 * If the default log size doesn't fit in the AG size, use the
> > -		 * minimum log size instead. This ensures small filesystems
> > -		 * don't use excessive amounts of space for the log.
> > +		 * For small filesystems, we want to use the XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES
> > +		 * for filesystems smaller than 16G if at all possible, ramping
> > +		 * up to 128MB at 256GB.
> >  		 */
> > -		if (min_logblocks * XFS_DFL_LOG_FACTOR >= agsize) {
> > -			logblocks = min_logblocks;
> > -		} else {
> > -			logblocks = MAX(logblocks,
> > -				MAX(XFS_DFL_LOG_SIZE,
> > -					min_logblocks * XFS_DFL_LOG_FACTOR));
> > +		 if (dblocks < GIGABYTES(16, blocklog)) {
> > +			logblocks = MIN(XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES >> blocklog,
> > +					min_logblocks * XFS_DFL_LOG_FACTOR);
> >  		}
> 
> Nit: extra space after tab before the 'if (dblocks < GIGABYTES(...)) {'
> line...

Oops. Will fix.

> More generally... by the time we get here, min_logblocks is at least
> XFS_MIN_LOG_BLOCKS and XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES (if the fs is >=1GB). The only
> way we would use the min_logblocks based value is if min_logblocks is
> less than 1/5 of XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES (due to DFL_LOG_FACTOR). After
> testing this a bit, creating a 20MB fs with 4k blocks gives me an
> initial min_logblocks of 853, which works out to ~16MB after
> DFL_LOG_FACTOR. So this effectively looks like an assignment of
> XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES in that case.

Good point - I hadn't considered the initial >1GB check much further
up the stack, and that explains the difference between my patch and
the 3.1.x code.

> In the sub 1GB case, we skip the existing XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES check, but
> this new block of code just adds it back, at least in the internal log case.

Right, this would handle it, I think.

		if (dblocks < GIGABYTES(1, blocklog)) {
			logblocks = min_logblocks;
		else if (dblocks < GIGABYTES(16, blocklog)) {
			logblocks = MIN(XFS_MIN_LOG_BYTES >> blocklog,
					min_logblocks * XFS_DFL_LOG_FACTOR);
		} else {
			/*
			 * With a 2GB max log size, default to maximum size
			 * at 4TB. This keeps the same ratio from the older
			 * max log size of 128M at 256GB fs size. IOWs,
			 * the ratio of fs size to log size is 2048:1.
			 */
			logblocks = (dblocks << blocklog) / 2048;
			logblocks = logblocks >> blocklog;
			logblocks = MAX(min_logblocks, logblocks);
		}

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      reply	other threads:[~2014-02-05 22:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-05  5:47 [PATCH] mkfs: default log size for small filesystems too large Dave Chinner
2014-02-05 19:29 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-05 22:55   ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140205225548.GG13997@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox