From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A221E7F4E
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 10:18:09 -0600 (CST)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11])
	by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CE6D304039
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:18:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ZenIV.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [195.92.253.2]) by
	cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 9cmtIeEdUpVhIwPw (version=TLSv1
	cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Fri, 14 Feb 2014 08:18:08 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 14 Feb 2014 16:18:01 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: 3.14-rc2 XFS backtrace because irqs_disabled.
Message-ID: <20140214161801.GV18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <20140212040358.GA25327@redhat.com>
	<20140212042215.GN18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<20140212054043.GB13997@dastard>
	<CA+55aFxy2t7bnCUc-DhhxYxsZ0+GwL9GuQXRYtE_VzqZusmB9A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140212113928.GO18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<CA+55aFywwx0Q8xK2GJiRJ+FV7PQEKoBRxDUxW4052FVyd5XOpg@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140212211421.GP18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
	<CA+55aFyobyUNFo=3rpdbxTqgV7OQetCKbCfwEEbgxUcT-1+30w@mail.gmail.com>
	<20140214161302.GA16416@infradead.org>
	<20140214161623.GU18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140214161623.GU18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 04:16:24PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> FWIW, there's a funny situation - all users of dequeue_signal_lock()
> actually ignore info completely.  I'm not saying that we ought to
> stop returning it, but e.g. jbd part of that patch is simply

s/jbd/jffs2/, obviously.  Sorry...  And yes, nbd and usb_storage are the
same story.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs