public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/9] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 11:27:13 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220002713.GI4916@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530463C6.6050509@oracle.com>

On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 03:56:54PM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> I read the previous comments from Dave about using defines for CRC offsets,
> and with a grep search after applying this patch, looks there have another
> two places maybe we should switch them to the macros as well:
> 
> fs/xfs/xfs_log.c:
> Do we need a log record crc offset macros for offsetof(struct xlog_rec_header, h_crc))?
> 
> xfs_dinode.h:
> we added the XFS_DINODE_CRC_OFF, just use it at below routine?
> 
> static inline uint xfs_dinode_size(int version)
> {
>         if (version == 3)
>                 return sizeof(struct xfs_dinode);
>         return offsetof(struct xfs_dinode, di_crc);
> }

No, that's a different case - it's not being used for determining
the offset of a CRC varaible - it's being used to calculate the size
of the version 2 inode core. Hence it should remain open coded like
because it has a different purpose in life....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-20  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-18 23:52 [PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 1/9] xfs: skip verification on initial "guess" superblock read Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19  3:36   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 2/9] xfs: limit superblock corruption errors to actual corruption Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19  3:37   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 3/9] xfs: skip pointless CRC updates after verifier failures Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19  6:35   ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 4/9] xfs: Use defines for CRC offsets in all cases Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19  7:56   ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-20  0:27     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-20  9:33       ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-20  9:41       ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-27  2:15         ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 5/9] xfs: add helper for verifying checksums on xfs_bufs Eric Sandeen
2014-02-27  4:17   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 6/9] xfs: add helper for updating " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 7/9] xfs: add xfs_verifier_error() Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19  6:30   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20  2:58   ` [PATCH 7/9 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-27  4:20     ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 8/9] xfs: print useful caller information in xfs_error_report Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 12:42   ` Jeff Liu
2014-02-18 23:52 ` [PATCH 9/9] xfs: modify verifiers to differentiate CRC from other errors Eric Sandeen
2014-02-19 14:01   ` Brian Foster
2014-02-19 16:12     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-20  3:10   ` [PATCH 9/9 V2] " Eric Sandeen
2014-02-20 13:10     ` Brian Foster
2014-02-27  9:12 ` [PATCH 0/9] current series for verifier error differentiation Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140220002713.GI4916@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox