public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/11] xfs: update inode allocation/free transaction reservations for finobt
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 13:14:57 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140220211457.GA8476@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <53064E26.2050607@redhat.com>

On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 01:49:10PM -0500, Brian Foster wrote:
> > Right, that can happen. But my question is this: how realistic is it
> > that we have someone who has ENOSPC because of enough zero length
> > files to trigger this? I've never seen an application or user try to
> > store any significant number of zero length files, so I suspect this
> > is a theoretical problem, not a practical one.
> > 
> 
> Probably not very realistic. ;) The only thing I know that does rely on
> some zero-length files is gluster distribution to represent "link files"
> when one a file that hashes to one server ends up stored on another.
> Even then, I don't see how we would ever have a situation where those
> link files exist in such massive numbers and are removed in bulk. So
> it's likely a pathological scenario.

Zero data blocks are the only case for device nodes or fifos, very
common for symlinks that can be stored inline, and not unusual for
directories.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-02-20 21:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-04 17:49 [PATCH v3 00/11] xfs: introduce the free inode btree Brian Foster
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 01/11] xfs: refactor xfs_ialloc_btree.c to support multiple inobt numbers Brian Foster
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 02/11] xfs: reserve v5 superblock read-only compat. feature bit for finobt Brian Foster
2014-02-11  6:07   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 03/11] xfs: support the XFS_BTNUM_FINOBT free inode btree type Brian Foster
2014-02-11  6:22   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 04/11] xfs: update inode allocation/free transaction reservations for finobt Brian Foster
2014-02-11  6:46   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 16:22     ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20  1:00       ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 16:04         ` Brian Foster
2014-02-18 17:10     ` Brian Foster
2014-02-18 20:34       ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20  2:01       ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 18:49         ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20 20:50           ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 21:14           ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-02-20 23:13             ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 05/11] xfs: insert newly allocated inode chunks into the finobt Brian Foster
2014-02-11  6:48   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 06/11] xfs: use and update the finobt on inode allocation Brian Foster
2014-02-11  7:17   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-11 16:32     ` Brian Foster
2014-02-14 20:01     ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20  0:38       ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 07/11] xfs: refactor xfs_difree() inobt bits into xfs_difree_inobt() helper Brian Foster
2014-02-11  7:19   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 08/11] xfs: update the finobt on inode free Brian Foster
2014-02-11  7:31   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 09/11] xfs: add finobt support to growfs Brian Foster
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 10/11] xfs: report finobt status in fs geometry Brian Foster
2014-02-11  7:34   ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-04 17:49 ` [PATCH v3 11/11] xfs: enable the finobt feature on v5 superblocks Brian Foster
2014-02-11  7:34   ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140220211457.GA8476@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox