From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 463F87FAD for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:40:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21C798F8040 for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 7DhNHeSqfwanqiE5 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:40:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:40:26 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs_io: add support for O_TMPFILE opens Message-ID: <20140220224026.GA25054@infradead.org> References: <20140220220000.GA17541@infradead.org> <20140220221518.GR4916@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140220221518.GR4916@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 09:15:18AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote: > Can you also push this into the main CLI interface similar to how > all the other open flags can be specified? Sure. > FWIW, any plans to add a "link" command to be able to link the > tmpfile into the namespace once it is created? I was planning to do that, but as pointed out in my next mail it seems we don't actually have any other namespace commands in xfs_io, so I'm starting to wonder if it's the right place. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs