From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Mark Tinguely <tinguely@sgi.com>
Cc: Brian Foster <bfoster@redhat.com>, xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfs: always do log forces via the workqueue
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2014 11:02:57 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140221000257.GU4916@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5306833D.7080600@sgi.com>
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 04:35:41PM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> On 02/20/14 16:07, Dave Chinner wrote:
> >On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 08:51:55AM -0600, Mark Tinguely wrote:
> >>We know the later error paths in xfs_cil_push() will not do a wake,
> >>now is a good time to fix that.
> >
> >I'm not sure what you are talking about here. If there's a problem,
> >please send patches.
>
> http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2013-12/msg00870.html
Which resulted in a discussion and discovery of more problems
that also needed fixing, so I'm waiting for patches to be posted
that fix them.
You know what the problems are, you know how they should be fixed
(it's in the discussion thread), and you are capable of writing
the fixes and testing them. So, please send patches.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-21 0:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-19 4:16 [PATCH 0/3] xfs: lockdep and stack reduction fixes Dave Chinner
2014-02-19 4:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] xfs: always do log forces via the workqueue Dave Chinner
2014-02-19 18:24 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20 0:23 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 14:51 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-02-20 22:07 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 22:35 ` Mark Tinguely
2014-02-21 0:02 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-21 15:04 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-21 22:21 ` Dave Chinner
2014-02-24 13:35 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-19 4:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix directory inode iolock lockdep false positive Dave Chinner
2014-02-19 18:25 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20 0:13 ` mmap_sem -> isec->lock lockdep issues with shmem (was Re: [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix directory inode iolock lockdep false positive) Dave Chinner
2014-02-20 14:51 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs: fix directory inode iolock lockdep false positive Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-19 4:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs: allocate xfs_da_args to reduce stack footprint Dave Chinner
2014-02-19 18:25 ` Brian Foster
2014-02-20 14:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-20 21:09 ` Dave Chinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140221000257.GU4916@dastard \
--to=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=tinguely@sgi.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox