public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>, xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_set_maxicount & use in growfs
Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 18:11:54 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140227071154.GK29907@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <530E3282.7000703@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Feb 26, 2014 at 12:29:22PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 2/25/14, 8:11 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 11:27:35PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> >> xfs_set_maxicount() overflowed fairly easily for large filesystems
> >> and large maxicount; we started out by multiplying dblocks by
> >> the percentage, *then* dividing by 100, and never checked for
> >> an overflow.  The calculations were also, IMHO, a little hard
> >> to follow.
> > 
> > Would be useful to get this test case into xfstests..
> 
> Ok so I was going on Dave's assertion about that.  ;)
> 
> To overflow, we'd need dblocks * 100 to be > 2^64-1:
> 
> so dblocks would need to be > (2^64-1)/100
> 
> for 4k blocks that's 655 exabytes.  Maybe not so possible after all ;)

Until the block count is corrupted by fsfuzzer? ;)

> Dave, maybe just removing the open-code is enough here.

Sure, but I still like the conversion to use mult_frac....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-02-27  7:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-02-25  5:27 [PATCH] xfs: clean up xfs_set_maxicount & use in growfs Eric Sandeen
2014-02-26  2:11 ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-02-26  2:18   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-26 18:29   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-02-27  7:11     ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-02-27 14:08       ` Eric Sandeen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140227071154.GK29907@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=sandeen@redhat.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox