From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7704F7F3F for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 11:14:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5A48F8033 for ; Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:14:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CM6zRkpfi53N0X2b (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 05 Mar 2014 09:14:42 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2014 09:14:41 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: inode log reservations are still too small Message-ID: <20140305171441.GD11667@infradead.org> References: <1393981893-2497-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1393981893-2497-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1393981893-2497-3-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com The fix looks correct, but care to remind me where we account for the xlog_op_header for all non-buf, non-inode transaction? _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs