From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AADF97F50 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 11:44:23 -0600 (CST) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A28304070 for ; Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:44:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 5jo91GfINk6pS1uJ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 06 Mar 2014 09:44:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 09:44:20 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/8] xfstests: Create single function for testing xfs_io commands Message-ID: <20140306174420.GA28297@infradead.org> References: <1394034699-21187-1-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> <1394034699-21187-2-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1394034699-21187-2-git-send-email-lczerner@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Lukas Czerner Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Mar 05, 2014 at 04:51:32PM +0100, Lukas Czerner wrote: > Currently there are several function testing various xfs_io commands. > This commit creates _require_xfs_io_command() to test any xfs_command. Looks good. Do you plan to keep the wrappers around _require_xfs_io_command in the long run or just for a transitional period? Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs