From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2EE57F51 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 06:07:34 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BA9304048 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 04:07:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id i9coGY6LgHhPnqw6 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 04:07:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 04:07:30 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: add a test for unlinked inodes due to O_TMPFILE Message-ID: <20140403110730.GB26244@infradead.org> References: <20140313101302.996355155@bombadil.infradead.org> <20140313101433.608283621@bombadil.infradead.org> <20140313112907.GJ4263@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140313112907.GJ4263@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com Skipping this for now, filtering the repair output properly is going to be a lot of work, and I'd rather do a generic unlinked inode list recovery test instead of tying it to O_TMPFILE. With the first patch already reviewed and the second updated those should be ready to apply now. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs