From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D62BA7F98 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 16:32:14 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7965304053 for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:32:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id mzfDpm3NcX7w1DjL for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 14:32:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2014 08:32:10 +1100 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] xfs: add a test for unlinked inodes due to O_TMPFILE Message-ID: <20140403213210.GQ17603@dastard> References: <20140313101302.996355155@bombadil.infradead.org> <20140313101433.608283621@bombadil.infradead.org> <20140313112907.GJ4263@dastard> <20140403110730.GB26244@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140403110730.GB26244@infradead.org> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 04:07:30AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Skipping this for now, filtering the repair output properly is going to > be a lot of work, and I'd rather do a generic unlinked inode list > recovery test instead of tying it to O_TMPFILE. > > With the first patch already reviewed and the second updated those > should be ready to apply now. OK, Thanks for the update. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs