From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0148A7F4E for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 21:23:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FD72AC002 for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:23:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id XpkdgsEHtFk8DsDn for ; Sun, 13 Apr 2014 19:23:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2014 12:23:47 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: filestream allocator rewrite Message-ID: <20140414022347.GI27694@dastard> References: <1397289723-26243-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1397289723-26243-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 10:01:54AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > This series is a major overhaul of the filestream allocator. The main point > is to use the dcache to get the parent and avoiding to maintain a fstrm_item > for each inode that the filestream is applied to in favor of just tracking > the parent, but there's various more or less related fallout from this as well. OVerall it looks good. I'll need to do some testing on it and have a deeper look at the main use-the-dentry-cache patch, but it removes a heap of complexity and code and gets rid of the use of inode IO locks, so there's a loot to like here... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs