From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71D17F55 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 04:16:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda3.sgi.com [192.48.176.15]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9924B8F8065 for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:16:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id FQ3vGXfb0hrqMFkE (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:16:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2014 02:16:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] xfstests: add helper for zero range support check Message-ID: <20140422091620.GA4980@infradead.org> References: <20140421204023.GB960@wallace> <20140422062816.GB31337@infradead.org> <20140422091443.GG15995@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140422091443.GG15995@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Eric Whitney On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 07:14:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > I don't really care either way, as long as all the checks are done > consistently. Send a patch to change them all... :) My flink test already avoids the wrapper :) So how about we stop adding them for now at least. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs