linux-xfs.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net>
Cc: xfs-oss <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 07:38:57 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140422213857.GM18672@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <534EC282.7010905@sandeen.net>

On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 12:48:50PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> XFS_ERROR was designed long ago to trap return values,
> but it's not runtime configurable, it's not consistently used,
> and we can do the same thing today with systemtap, using
> something like:
> 
> probe module("xfs").function("xfs_*").return { if (@defined($return) && $return == VALUE) { ... } }
> 
> Just nuke XFS_ERROR and associated bits.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@redhat.com>

Eric, given the rebasing impact of this change on other pending
work, I think we should plan to merge this just prior to the next
upstream merge. Perhaps regenerate it against the for-next branch
a week before the merge window is likely to open, and then apply
it? That way we (well, I) don't have to spend a alrge proportion of
this merge window fixing up patch mismatches vs the master branch?

Is that an acceptible approach for everyone?

(Note: I'm assuming Christoph is OK with this given the ftrace
scripts we can use to replace this macro...)

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

      parent reply	other threads:[~2014-04-22 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-04-16 17:40 [PATCH 0/2] xfs: clean up return handling Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 17:44 ` [PATCH 1/2] xfs: return is not a function Eric Sandeen
2014-04-21  6:58   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:48 ` [PATCH 2/2] xfs: Nuke XFS_ERROR macro Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 17:51   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-16 17:55     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 19:11       ` Eric Sandeen
2014-04-16 22:08         ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 23:44           ` Steven Rostedt
2014-04-17  0:39             ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-17  0:49               ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-21  6:57               ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-04-21 23:43                 ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-16 22:28     ` Dave Chinner
2014-04-22 21:38   ` Dave Chinner [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140422213857.GM18672@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=sandeen@sandeen.net \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).