From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF89D7F52 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:21:51 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254F304051 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:21:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id fNvh4jCSQ8AGpuXR (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:21:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:21:46 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] generic/204: tweak reserve pool size Message-ID: <20140423152146.GA26128@infradead.org> References: <1398204274-2113-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1398204274-2113-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398204274-2113-2-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:04:29AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > On small block size filesystems, the reserve pool size is kept > constant at 4MB. filesystems with smaller blocks use comparitively > more blocks for indexing metadata (e.g. in the inode and extent > btrees) and so having a higher indirect block usage. Hence we need > to leave the reserve pool at 1024 block and not scale it for a > constant size. > > This makes the test pass on a filesystem made with MKFS_OPTIONS="-b > size=1024 -m crc=1". Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs