From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6BE77F52 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 10:23:15 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4183EAC001 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:23:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id WS0UEyLFjS507UEa (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:23:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:23:13 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] xfs: introduce new large ACL test Message-ID: <20140423152313.GC26128@infradead.org> References: <1398204274-2113-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1398204274-2113-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1398204274-2113-4-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 08:04:31AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > From: Dave Chinner > > Having just removed the largeacl test from the shared ACL test, > reintroduce the same test as an XFS specific test so that we can > handle the different limits in supported ACL count appropriately. I'd prefer to have this as a shared test, and define a _max_acl_size function in common.acl that does a switch for the fs type. Only start with XFS for now, but if the maintainers of other filesystems care enough they could add their limits. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs