From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
Cc: "xfs@oss.sgi.com" <xfs@oss.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_inumbers
Date: Wed, 23 Apr 2014 08:36:39 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140423153639.GB3326@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <535078B2.8010601@oracle.com>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 08:58:26AM +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> From: Jie Liu <jeff.liu@oracle.com>
>
> To fetch the file system number tables, we currently just ignore the
> errors and proceed to loop over the next AG or bump agino to the next
> chunk in case of btree operations failed, that is not properly because
> those errors might hint us potential file system problems.
>
> This patch rework xfs_inumbers() to handle the btree operation errors
> as well as the loop conditions. Also, add pre-checkups for the given
> inode, we can save alloc/free the format buffer once against an invalid
> inode number.
The patch looks mostly good to me, but I really think it should be
split into two patches: one to do the formatting changes and code
consolidation, and then one that does the actual logic changes for
better error handling. It's not easy to understand and verify with
these two different changes combined.
> xfs_inumbers_fmt(
> void __user *ubuffer, /* buffer to write to */
> - const xfs_inogrp_t *buffer, /* buffer to read from */
> + const struct xfs_inogrp *buffer, /* buffer to read from */
> long count, /* # of elements to read */
> long *written) /* # of bytes written */
> {
> if (copy_to_user(ubuffer, buffer, count * sizeof(*buffer)))
> - return -EFAULT;
> + return XFS_ERROR(EFAULT);
xfs_inumbers_fmt_compat will need the same treatment.
> *count = 0;
> + if (agno >= mp->m_sb.sb_agcount ||
> + *lastino != XFS_AGINO_TO_INO(mp, agno, agino))
> + return 0;
Where is the lastino check coming from?
> buffer = kmem_alloc(bcount * sizeof(*buffer), KM_SLEEP);
> + bufidx = error = 0;
Why not initialize bufidx and error at declaration time?
> + error = xfs_inobt_get_rec(cur, &r, &stat);
> + if (error || !stat)
> + break;
The old code moved on to the next AG here, why has this changed?
_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-04-23 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-04-18 0:58 [PATCH v2 03/10] xfs: consolidate xfs_inumbers Jeff Liu
2014-04-23 15:36 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-05-04 12:32 ` Jeff Liu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140423153639.GB3326@infradead.org \
--to=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=jeff.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).