From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18BE7F52 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 00:51:04 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A01398F8039 for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:51:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail04.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.141]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gvz8H4XY0ggNZa7t for ; Wed, 23 Apr 2014 22:51:02 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 15:51:01 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/11] xfs: introduce the free inode btree Message-ID: <20140424055101.GD15995@dastard> References: <1397146116-42546-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> <20140414094632.GC31578@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140414094632.GC31578@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 07:46:32PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 12:08:25PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > This is a minor rebase of the finobt series on the latest for-next > > branch. The previous version (v4) is here: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-02/msg00763.html > > > > The most recent series with review feedback is v3: > > > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-02/msg00121.html > > > > Brian > > I've just had a look at this series, and I haven't found anything to > complain about apart from a couple of stray whitespaces that I > fixed. I'm going to run it through some finobt=0 test runs until i > get a chance to look at the userspace patches. If I don't notice > anything in the next couple of days, I'll merge the topic branch > into the main tree.... All looks pretty good. I can fix the one little problem I noticed myself, and so I think this is ready for merging. The userspace stuff isn't directly necessary right away - that won't get merged until 3.2 is released, but I don't see that as a problem for merging the kernel code... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs