From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84CB07F52 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 14:20:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 517E28F8040 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:20:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id gcYKKQDRPYS1eAw8 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:20:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 12:20:52 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstests: test pipe resizing Message-ID: <20140424192052.GA32696@infradead.org> References: <5359625B.3090001@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5359625B.3090001@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: Miklos Szeredi , xfs-oss On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 02:13:31PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > Add a simple test to exercise the pipe resize fcntls, > F_SETPIPE_SZ and F_GETPIPE_SZ. > > This doesn't do a whole lot, but does some pipe reading > and writing, some pipe resizing and checking, validates > that we get EBUSY if we try to resize below the current > size of buffers in the pipe, that the minimum is limited > to PAGE_SIZE, etc. How is this a filesystem issue? I think this belongs into ltp. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs