From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E5507F52 for ; Fri, 25 Apr 2014 00:40:23 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C39304048 for ; Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:40:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2014 22:40:21 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC] libxfs: adding attribute fork frees xfs_inode ptr Message-ID: <20140425054021.GA16132@infradead.org> References: <20140423210034.892939354@sgi.com> <20140423210445.700477624@sgi.com> <20140423222215.GT18672@dastard> <535945DC.6010108@sgi.com> <53597B34.9050407@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53597B34.9050407@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: XFS Mailing List On Thu, Apr 24, 2014 at 03:59:32PM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > PS. I may not have been very clear, the libxfs_trans_roll() and > inode_item_done() also cause a premature libxfs_iput(). > Let me do more testing making any changes and target this for > xfsprogs-3.2.1. You mean you've fixed the way we handle the attachement of inodes to transaction in userspace to mirror what we do in kernelspace? I'd love to review this if you have patches as it's a somewhat of a pain point to have these work so different in kernel and userspace. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs