From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E43EE7F3F for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 05:16:30 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 661CAAC002 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 03:16:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from newverein.lst.de (verein.lst.de [213.95.11.211]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Di54fZ0Gwnlu72gJ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 04 May 2014 03:16:26 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 12:16:23 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: attr cleanups Message-ID: <20140504101623.GA4947@lst.de> References: <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <53651375.9080305@sgi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <53651375.9080305@sgi.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Mark Tinguely Cc: Christoph Hellwig , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone. We might have to introduce _locked version at that point. But I'd like to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs