From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D3587F57 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 16:52:57 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D69DC8F8035 for ; Sun, 4 May 2014 14:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail07.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.131]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id m6WM2CZ3PGPx7MpT for ; Sun, 04 May 2014 14:52:54 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 07:52:41 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: attr cleanups Message-ID: <20140504215241.GQ26353@dastard> References: <1399130415-5382-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <53651375.9080305@sgi.com> <20140504101623.GA4947@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140504101623.GA4947@lst.de> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Mark Tinguely , xfs@oss.sgi.com On Sun, May 04, 2014 at 12:16:23PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2014 at 11:04:05AM -0500, Mark Tinguely wrote: > > Depends on how parent inode pointers are implemented, this folding the > > internal version of get and set attributes could be undone. > > We might have to introduce _locked version at that point. But I'd like > to keep the xfs_name removal and other assorted cleanups. *nod* If we need to factor the code for new additions, then we should do that appropriately for the new code when it arrives. Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs