From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42A5A7FD5 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 03:18:22 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA889AC008 for ; Tue, 6 May 2014 01:18:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iJe9B4COtY5DDrUG (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 06 May 2014 01:18:20 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 6 May 2014 01:18:20 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] xfs: remove shared supberlock feature checking Message-ID: <20140506081820.GD24143@infradead.org> References: <1399348559-19889-1-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> <1399348559-19889-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1399348559-19889-6-git-send-email-david@fromorbit.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 01:55:59PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > > We reject any filesystem that is mounted with this feature bit set, > so we don't need to check for it anywhere else. Remove the function > for checking if the feature bit is set and any code that uses it. > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig If someone at SGI has some spare time for a BugWorks search I'd really love to figure out of the story behind the shared superblock feature.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs