From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9C47F52 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 05:05:43 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDC048F8039 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 03:05:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com (aserp1040.oracle.com [141.146.126.69]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nc2HIEWWCLZCyDhJ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 03:05:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:05:29 +0800 From: Liu Bo Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs/035: update clone test to expect EOPNOTSUPP Message-ID: <20140508100528.GD3407@localhost.localdomain> References: <1399465998-26545-1-git-send-email-ddiss@suse.de> <20140508041123.GB3407@localhost.localdomain> <20140508110522.21930dfd@f163.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140508110522.21930dfd@f163.suse.de> Reply-To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: David Disseldorp Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com On Thu, May 08, 2014 at 11:05:22AM +0200, David Disseldorp wrote: > Hi liubo, > > On Thu, 8 May 2014 12:11:24 +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > > > Something different here, I didn't get EIO on 3.15.0-rc4. > > Strange, I'm able to consistently reproduce this on a > vanilla v3.15-rc4-202-g30321c7 kernel. > Does that mean the updated test passes successfully for you? (yeah I've reproduce that error as well) The interesting thing is that if you do a _scratch_remount before 'cat $SCRATCH_MNT/src', it goes well, I'm looking into why... -liubo _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs