From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EC3E7F55 for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 03:57:10 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F3138F804C for ; Thu, 8 May 2014 01:57:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mx2.suse.de (cantor2.suse.de [195.135.220.15]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id 63GHTJv4QL0SLyGJ (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 08 May 2014 01:57:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 11:05:22 +0200 From: David Disseldorp Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs/035: update clone test to expect EOPNOTSUPP Message-ID: <20140508110522.21930dfd@f163.suse.de> In-Reply-To: <20140508041123.GB3407@localhost.localdomain> References: <1399465998-26545-1-git-send-email-ddiss@suse.de> <20140508041123.GB3407@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: bo.li.liu@oracle.com Cc: linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com Hi liubo, On Thu, 8 May 2014 12:11:24 +0800, Liu Bo wrote: > Something different here, I didn't get EIO on 3.15.0-rc4. Strange, I'm able to consistently reproduce this on a vanilla v3.15-rc4-202-g30321c7 kernel. Does that mean the updated test passes successfully for you? Cheers, David _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs