From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com>
Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15])
	by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D047F50
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 16 May 2014 03:53:24 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25])
	by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38791AC00C
	for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>; Fri, 16 May 2014 01:53:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with
	ESMTP id nDQNmSSw1maaHYyY (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA
	bits=256 verify=NO) for <xfs@oss.sgi.com>;
	Fri, 16 May 2014 01:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 16 May 2014 01:53:20 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests: new mailing list
Message-ID: <20140516085320.GA29279@infradead.org>
References: <20140516044611.GA8206@dastard>
	<20140516054009.GA17647@infradead.org>
	<alpine.LFD.2.00.1405161047010.2099@localhost.localdomain>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1405161047010.2099@localhost.localdomain>
List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI <xfs.oss.sgi.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/options/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://oss.sgi.com/pipermail/xfs>
List-Post: <mailto:xfs@oss.sgi.com>
List-Help: <mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs>,
	<mailto:xfs-request@oss.sgi.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com
To: Luk?? Czerner <lczerner@redhat.com>
Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org

On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 10:48:42AM +0200, Luk?? Czerner wrote:
> > > As requested I've created a new mailing list for xfstests
> > > development and discussion. Reflecting the fact that the test
> > > harness is not really XFS specific anymore, the list is:
> > > 
> > > 	fstests@vger.kernel.org
> > 
> > Isn't there an "x" missing somewhere?
> 
> It's intentional and it is "Reflecting the fact that the test
> harness is not really XFS specific anymore", even though the test
> suite itself keep the name xfstests.
> 
> This way it's more obvious to people that this is in fact not xfs
> specific.

Having the name different from the project it is for is stupid.  Either
rename the test suite, or use the same name for the mailing list.

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs