From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 105F37F4E for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 09:55:52 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5872304066 for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:55:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id CmmzE97yiMAM2K5l (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 19 May 2014 07:55:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 07:55:41 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] xfstests: new mailing list Message-ID: <20140519145541.GA32055@infradead.org> References: <20140516044611.GA8206@dastard> <20140516054009.GA17647@infradead.org> <20140516085320.GA29279@infradead.org> <20140516221930.GA8554@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140516221930.GA8554@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Dave Chinner Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs@oss.sgi.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Luk?? Czerner , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 08:19:30AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Renaming the test suite take a lot more work - .e.g renaming/moving > source trees and a fixing all the documentation that points to it... In that case please call the list xfstests - a name different by a single character is utterly confusing. And I defintively see some merit to the suggestion that we'll just keep the x and allow people to come up with a nice backronym for it if they care enough. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs