From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay3.corp.sgi.com [198.149.34.15]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C47D7F4E for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 10:12:08 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay3.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 021E7AC003 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 08:12:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from buxtehude.debian.org (buxtehude.debian.org [140.211.166.26]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id Q0PRFFobHB6IhF7S (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 08:12:06 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Bug#748483: xfsprogs: Let's add a watch file Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org Resent-Message-ID: Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:47:01 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20140521144701.GA3580@infradead.org> References: <20140517175957.5232.71552.reportbug@lamella> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140517175957.5232.71552.reportbug@lamella> Reply-To: Christoph Hellwig , 748483@bugs.debian.org List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Vincent Blut , 748483@bugs.debian.org Cc: Debian Bug Tracking System On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 07:59:57PM +0200, Vincent Blut wrote: > Source: xfsprogs > Version: 3.1.9 > Severity: wishlist > > Hey guys, > > Even if it doesn't necessarily improve your workflow, the watch file could > improve some Debian tools that check it (e.g. UDD). > Could you please apply the attached one in your next upload? I'll assume this should go into debian/watch? It's probably best if you simply submit a patch that adds it with proper From:, Subject: and Signed-off-by: tags so it can be applied as-is. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs