From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0A27F4E for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 09:49:06 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 513378F8037 for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:49:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id nNIcz17IBosjeD07 (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 May 2014 07:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 07:48:59 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/2] xfs: sysfs attribute support Message-ID: <20140521144859.GB3580@infradead.org> References: <1400263966-35541-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1400263966-35541-1-git-send-email-bfoster@redhat.com> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Brian Foster Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 02:12:44PM -0400, Brian Foster wrote: > Hi all, > > This is an rfc to get some discussion rolling on sysfs support for XFS. > The motivation for this work is here: > > http://oss.sgi.com/archives/xfs/2014-05/msg00381.html All the sysfs magic for this looks pretty ugly. Why can't we just dump it into debugfs given that it's very much a debug only feature anyway? It would also be really nitfy to have a tool to fronted it in the style of xfs_db and xfs_io.. _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs