public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
To: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for new dev cycle (3.17)
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:09:44 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140610060944.GG9508@dastard> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140609223320.GE9508@dastard>

On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 08:33:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> 
> Now that the 3.16 dev cycle has drawn to a close (one more
> linux-next build and I'll tag for-next and send a pull request),
> it's time to look ahead for the next couple of months. I think the
> current major pieces of work that are currently outstanding are
> these:
> 
> 	- Jeff's bulkstat rework
> 	- Brian's EOF prealloc scanning
> 	- Namjae's FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE work
> 	- Eric's XFS_ERROR() macro removal and return () cleanup.
> 
> There's also two major pieces of infrastructure work I'd like to get
> done:
> 
> 	- convert XFS to negative error returns
> 	- restructure code to have a fs/xfs/libxfs structure similar
> 	  to userspace
> 
> Because Eric's XFS_ERROR removal touches the entire codebase, as
> does the negative error return and the libxfs restructuring, I'd
> like to get these done first and base the rest of the dev cycle work
> on top of that. Eric's patches just need a minor rebase and the
> libxfs restructure needs some makefile rework and review and they
> should be good to go.

There is a new version of this work (Eric's patches and the base
libxfs restructure) here:

	git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-libxfs-restructure

It's based on 3.15 with the current for-next branch merged into it
and then the changes done over the top, so it's about as up-to-date
as it can be. Comments welcome...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-06-10  6:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-06-09 22:33 [DISCUSS] Planning for new dev cycle (3.17) Dave Chinner
2014-06-10  6:09 ` Dave Chinner [this message]
2014-06-10 14:09   ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-10 21:54     ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-10 21:57     ` Eric Sandeen
2014-06-10 11:58 ` Brian Foster
2014-06-10 21:48   ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-11  9:10     ` Dave Chinner
2014-06-12 20:01       ` Brian Foster
2014-06-12 23:28         ` Dave Chinner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140610060944.GG9508@dastard \
    --to=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox