From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay1.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.111]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED45C7F6C for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 01:09:54 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda2.sgi.com [192.48.176.25]) by relay1.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66408F8068 for ; Mon, 9 Jun 2014 23:09:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id rGgsRnzHmeOxSWN3 for ; Mon, 09 Jun 2014 23:09:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dave by dastard with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WuFFg-0005zY-H6 for xfs@oss.sgi.com; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:09:44 +1000 Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 16:09:44 +1000 From: Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Planning for new dev cycle (3.17) Message-ID: <20140610060944.GG9508@dastard> References: <20140609223320.GE9508@dastard> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20140609223320.GE9508@dastard> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: xfs@oss.sgi.com On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 08:33:20AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Now that the 3.16 dev cycle has drawn to a close (one more > linux-next build and I'll tag for-next and send a pull request), > it's time to look ahead for the next couple of months. I think the > current major pieces of work that are currently outstanding are > these: > > - Jeff's bulkstat rework > - Brian's EOF prealloc scanning > - Namjae's FALLOC_FL_INSERT_RANGE work > - Eric's XFS_ERROR() macro removal and return () cleanup. > > There's also two major pieces of infrastructure work I'd like to get > done: > > - convert XFS to negative error returns > - restructure code to have a fs/xfs/libxfs structure similar > to userspace > > Because Eric's XFS_ERROR removal touches the entire codebase, as > does the negative error return and the libxfs restructuring, I'd > like to get these done first and base the rest of the dev cycle work > on top of that. Eric's patches just need a minor rebase and the > libxfs restructure needs some makefile rework and review and they > should be good to go. There is a new version of this work (Eric's patches and the base libxfs restructure) here: git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git xfs-libxfs-restructure It's based on 3.15 with the current for-next branch merged into it and then the changes done over the top, so it's about as up-to-date as it can be. Comments welcome... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@fromorbit.com _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs