From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from relay.sgi.com (relay2.corp.sgi.com [137.38.102.29]) by oss.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C607F3F for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 04:34:45 -0500 (CDT) Received: from cuda.sgi.com (cuda1.sgi.com [192.48.157.11]) by relay2.corp.sgi.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80EDB304279 for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:34:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]) by cuda.sgi.com with ESMTP id iWGB5rzwJAZSua4J (version=TLSv1 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:34:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2014 02:34:40 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfs/279: use MKFS_XFS_PROG, not hardcoded path Message-ID: <20140616093440.GA26172@infradead.org> References: <539B68D2.2000300@sandeen.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <539B68D2.2000300@sandeen.net> List-Id: XFS Filesystem from SGI List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com Sender: xfs-bounces@oss.sgi.com To: Eric Sandeen Cc: fstests@vger.kernel.org, xfs-oss On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 04:10:42PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote: > I'm really not sure why this wasn't this way from the start. > On some systems it's in /usr/sbin, and the test fails. > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list xfs@oss.sgi.com http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs