public inbox for linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
To: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
Cc: xfs@oss.sgi.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/6] libxfs: reused invalidated buffers leak state and data
Date: Sat, 5 Jul 2014 02:48:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140705094807.GB18130@infradead.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140704222210.GM9508@dastard>

On Sat, Jul 05, 2014 at 08:22:10AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> I'm open to other ways of fixing this, but right now we've got to
> fix xfs_repair because it's currently breaking filesystems worse
> than before xfs_repair was run...

Ok, so clearly mark this as difference from kernel code in a long
comment explaining the situation similar to wrote you above.  It's
pretty obvious that the buffer cache in userspace will eventually need
a major overhaul sooner or later.  I wonder how feasible porting the
kernel one would be..

_______________________________________________
xfs mailing list
xfs@oss.sgi.com
http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

  reply	other threads:[~2014-07-05  9:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-04  5:57 [PATCH 0/6] xfsprogs: fixes for 3.2.1 Dave Chinner
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 1/6] repair: support more than 25 ACLs Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:23   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 2/6] xfs_db: write command broken on 64 bit values Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:08   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 3/6] repair: handle directory block corruption in phase 6 Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:24   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 4/6] libxfs: reused invalidated buffers leak state and data Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:15   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04 22:22     ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-05  9:48       ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2014-07-06 23:54         ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-07  0:09           ` Dave Chinner
2014-07-07 10:05             ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 5/6] repair: fix quota inode handling in secondary superblocks Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:35   ` Christoph Hellwig
2014-07-04  5:57 ` [PATCH 6/6] repair: get rid of BADFSINO Dave Chinner
2014-07-04 14:15   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20140705094807.GB18130@infradead.org \
    --to=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox